From TAMUCC Wiki

SGarza: MinhDucAnalysis

Lin, Andrew(2004).Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a new resource. 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved September 26, 2006. <jmsc.hku.hk/faculty/alih/publications/utaustin-2004-wikipedia-rc2.pdf>

It's a research analyze the methodology that the website used in order to look at different point of view to see its strength and weakness. How did they overcome the problem of proving the reliability of the articles and writings.

The thesis statement is not clear as the paper focus on many different things. The points and ideas are spread in the abstarct, introduction and overview of the article. The main points of the article to analyze the methodology that the website used. Their thought about how it gonna attract all the reader in all fields, set up a standard definiton, conversation, discussion for people. Its also analyze how successful was the method.

Retrieved from http://www.sci.tamucc.edu/wiki/SGarza/MinhDucAnalysis
Page last modified on September 26, 2006, at 08:14 PM CST