SeanBritt.SynthesizingPerspectives History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output - Cancel

Added lines 1-16:
'''Evaluating the Content'''
*What did you learn from this source? (in general terms)
*What is the thesis or claim of this reading? Is there a perspective or slant that you can identify?
*Does this source acknowledge opposing viewpoint(s)? Does it do so fairly?
*Is this piece intended as an argument? Is it an effective one?
*How does this information connect to or contradict other sources you are reading on this topic?
*Are there sources cited in this reading that you would find useful? That you would distrust?
*Other observations?
*Would this source be valuable to link to, or does it serve a different purpose for your writing?

'''Evaluating the rhetorical setting (who is talking to whom)'''
*Who is the author(s) and what is his/her expertise in the subject? (Note: if your source is written anonymously, what might that suggest? If it is a government document, what does that mean?)
*What do you think is the motive or purpose of the author?
*Who do you think is the intended readership/audience for this source? How does that affect its content and language?
*How does the writer try to persuade readers (ethos? logos? pathos?)
*Other observations?